Skip to main content
Audits, issues and statements

Disproportionate burden

Guidance on claiming disproportionate burden for accessibility issues in DfE digital services, including legal requirements and best practices.

Disproportionate burden is a clause within the accessibility regulations that provides some reprieve based on an organisation's remit, and the size and cost of remediation work. Meeting the clause requires the organisation to carry out a test.

The clause is appropriate for small organisations, like a parish council that are run on a largely voluntary basis.

It's the prioritisation or lack of designing for accessibility at the start, and throughout, that causes issues or increased expense.

DfE has considerable funding, therefore, it is not appropriate to apply it in DfE.

When you remove the rationale of money and time - the disproportionate burden route only:

  • increases governance and internal processes
  • opens DfE to scrutiny, as people will ask for and publicise details of the decision and calculation of the request
  • slows down wider take-up of the regulations
The disproportionate burden test

When testing for disproportionate burden, you must consider the scale and capacity of the organisation to resolve the issue.

Evaluate:

  • cost of making the product or website accessible
  • people needed to resolve the issue
  • benefit to users with disabilities
  • how often the product is used
  • how long people spend interacting with it

You should also:

  • show what disproportionate burden you are applying in your accessibility statement
  • publish your evidence and test outcomes

Tell us what you think of this page